Australia’s hypocrisy on immigration revealed

0 23


THE Trump administration’s controversial coverage to separate immigrant households brought on international outrage.

Over the previous few weeks, residents, celebrities and politicians across the globe criticised Donald Trump’s “zero tolerance” method, which noticed kids faraway from their dad and mom and housed in cages.

Mr Trump’s personal spouse Melania expressed her disapproval this week, with a spokeswoman for the First Woman saying she “hates to see kids separated from their households and hopes either side of the aisle can lastly come collectively to attain profitable immigration reform”.

Inside Australia there was widespread settlement that the heartbreaking coverage — which Mr Trump has since signed an order to finish — was merciless, barbaric and inhumane.

However as a nation Australia’s place of shock strikes a discomforting tone — particularly as a result of we systematically implement one of many world’s strictest insurance policies on asylum seekers.

Yassmin Abdel-Magied, a Sudanese-Australian social activist who incessantly campaigns for the rights of refugees, made this level in a now-viral tweet final night time, stating that Australia “is in no place to be morally superior given our report on Manus, Nauru and … I suppose since invasion”.

The worst factor about seeing these items go down within the US is understanding Aus is in no place to be morally superior given our report on Manus, Nauru and… I suppose since invasion. 😔

— Yassmin Abdel-Magied (@yassmin_a) June 20, 2018

You would possibly suppose an Australian refugee activist and the President who enforced this “zero tolerance” coverage would don’t have any widespread floor, however Mr Trump himself made an analogous level throughout a telephone name with our Prime Minister final yr.

Effectively, kind of. In January 2017, Malcolm Turnbull made a telephone name to the newly-inaugurated President.

In the course of the name, which was transcribed by the Washington Put up, Mr Turnbull defined that Australia wouldn’t settle for asylum seekers by boat underneath any circumstances.

“Even when we expect you’re the finest particular person on the planet, even if you’re a Nobel prize-winning genius, we is not going to allow you to in,” Mr Turnbull mentioned.

Mr Trump replied: “That’s a good suggestion. We should always do this too. You might be worse than I’m.”

Whereas it’s not in our coverage to separate kids from their dad and mom, refugees have spent years in limbo on Manus Island and Nauru, whereas 12 individuals have died within the situations.

In July 2013, then prime minister Kevin Rudd introduced that offshore processing would resume.

Asylum seekers who have been headed to Australia by boat would as a substitute be taken to Manus Island in Papua New Guinea and detained indefinitely whereas assessments have been made.

5 years and three authorities administrations later, little has modified.

If the human rights facet doesn’t pique your curiosity, think about this: over $9 billion has been spent to keep up these offshore detention centres over the previous 5 years. That’s billions of dollars in your taxpayer cash that might have been spent on training, hospitals and infrastructure.

Our therapy of asylum seekers over time has hardly been misplaced on the remainder of the world — together with the US.

In December 2016, the New York Occasions launched a blistering assault on the coverage, slamming Immigration Minister Peter Dutton as our “personal little Trump”.

The weekend characteristic — by Occasions op-ed columnist Roger Cohen — deemed our offshore coverage a “rising embarrassment” after talking to varied asylum seekers in detention.

“The federal government says it has prevented deaths like these within the Mediterranean, the place greater than four,000 migrants have drowned this yr,” Cohen wrote.

“By turning again the ‘queue jumpers,’ a phrase that resonates in a nation dedicated to a “truthful go” for all, it has safeguarded Australia’s proper to pick out who will get to individuals an enormous and empty nation. The official vow that these marooned on Manus and Nauru won’t ever reside in Australia has assumed doctrinal vehemence.

“In Peter Dutton, the immigration minister, the nation has its personal little Trump.”

Including energy to that comparability, Mr Dutton — who continues to supervise the federal government’s Nauru coverage — shouldn’t be shy about his ambitions to develop into prime minister.

“After all I wish to be prime minister, sooner or later,” he instructed The Guardian in April. “I believe it’s finest to be sincere about that, that’s an ambition long-held and is simply life like if stars align and a chance comes up.”

Irrespective of how justified we’re in our criticism of the US proper now, it’s arduous to not really feel uncomfortable reflecting on simply how brief we fall of an ethical excessive floor.

@gavindfernando | gavin.fernando@information.com.au



Supply hyperlink – https://www.information.com.au/way of life/real-life/news-life/australias-hypocritical-position-on-trumps-immigration-policy/news-story/b7aacca93c6e2518c9c66d20cad3f20c

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.